Different Kind of COVID-19 Victim


Job seekers are screwed if something happens right now to their documents proving they can work. Imagine due to a fluke of circumstances, a new hire’s documents for the I9 are lost or destroyed, say through an act of God. They try to get replacements but find vital records, passport services, and the SSA are all closed until further notice due to COVID-19. And no temporary relaxing of the law due to COVID-19.

It’s a perfect storm of unconstitutionally screwing law-abiding citizens because of past corporate greed. Getting a job right now is a rarity and employers don’t have to be patient in waiting for a new employee to attain replacement docs.

Sure, one could pay for multiple copies and documents just in case. But why should it be necessary?
It certainly seems unconstitutional to force workers to repeatedly prove their citizenship just to live when the federal government already knows they are eligible to work - all while the government could have, but does not have, options for employers to get verification or for workers to attain a federal citizen ID card. Everyone else can get such a card. This law is not much better than the ACA individual mandate! It’s in essence an encroachment of inalienable rights.

So, what should we do? Repeal the law requiring I9s? Not necessarily. What we need is, for the first time in history maybe, a law that is not only useful but actually practical - and constitutional. A law that protects U.S. workers from losing jobs to illegal workers while not placing the burden on U.S. workers. Also, not penalizing companies unless they get caught with illegal aliens.

There are solutions to this that can maintain privacy and security while not requiring U.S. citizens to repeatedly prove they are eligible to work - a birthright to natural-born citizens.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Trump Virus

We’ve recently heard Nancy Pelosi call the novel coronavirus the Trump Virus. What we’ve seen the Democrats say and do this year is way beyond unconscionable. And now to start a catchphrase like that – the whole behavior on the left is just disgusting.  A second virus in the same family is again coming out of the same city (Wuhan) in China (brand new in 2003) with that country’s only level 4 bio lab that we helped fund including funding sent in 2014 (Obama years) to study bat viruses (the genetics of this coronavirus was confirmed to come from those in bats). If we attribute anyone or anywhere to the virus, it would be China or Wuhan China.  Moreover, but secondary to this discussion is, why did these two viruses from the same place coincidentally appear just before a presidential election of a Republican incumbent? The first one, SARS (SARS-CoV) appeared late 2003 before the 2004 Presidential election with G. W. Bush as the incumbent POTUS. Now it’s Trump as the incumbent (SA...
Read more

Face Masks: Asia vs. U.S.A.

Seeing Japanese people wearing facemasks was a common thing the last time I visited Japan, 13 years ago. Those I saw wearing facemasks were in high enough frequency it was remarkable to me. The Japanese I worked with over there described wearing masks as a proven method to prevent spreading illness and their civic duty to wear them if they're ill. Today you'll see most Japanese wearing facemasks. Could that have contributed to why they have only one case of COVID-19 in every 120,500 people and 30% fewer deaths, while the U.S. has one case in every 12,325 people? We have only 2.6 times as many citizens in the U.S.A. but we have 26 times more geographically area than Japan, making them 10 times as densely populated, and that is conservative given most of the population is in less than half the area. And they have the 4th busiest airport in the world. My guess is if they required everyone and all visitors to wear facemasks, the case count would be significantly l...
Read more

Ultraviolet Radiation on SARS-CoV2

Just sharing my thoughts on the impact of Ultraviolet (UV) light in sunlight on deactivating the Coronavirus. I've read articles and news reports saying sunlight doesn't kill the virus. I think they wrote such simply because Trump said it did. They mentioned the various wavelengths of UV light and how only the shortest are effective at deactivating the virus. They only offered an opinion about its lack of effectiveness against SARS-CoV2 citing past studies loosely relevant to back various points of their opinion. But they did not themselves study the effect of sunlight on the virus. There are three bands (range of wavelengths) of UV light identified based on their interactions with biological material. Understand that a band is a range of wavelengths. The shorter wavelengths are the most dangerous to genetic material. However, the shorter the wavelength the easier it is absorbed in the stratosphere. So the claims are that sunlight doesn't kill the virus. I disagree. Our ski...
Read more